Chomsky’s Generative Grammar
Since 1960, a school thought of Linguistics is predominated
by (transformational) generative grammar. He thought that a set of grammar
rules is generated by a machine. The founding father of generative grammar –
Noam Chomsky – is the most important figure in seeing the relation between
linguistics and psychology.
The Difference Chomsky with Skinner and the Birth of
Psycholinguistics
Skinner stated that humans are like papers, very much
influenced by the environment. He ignored humans’ desire; feeling and humans
are really steered by the environment. Chomsky and Skinner’s
ideas could be received by showing that humans have desire, feelings and
ends and they are not like stones. Chomsky assumes that humans
are born with innate grammar competence and influenced by nature. He also proposed
that an account of verbal behavior requires a specification of what a person
must know in order to use a language.
Introduction to Universal Grammar
All languages share a small set of
syntactic categories and that these categories can be combined to form phrases
whose internal structure includes heads, complements, and specifiers.
Universal Grammar
The system of categories, mechanisms and
constraints shared by all human languages is called Universal Grammar (UG). è innate to humans. It attempts to explain language
acquisition in general, not describe specific languages. The theory does not claim that all human
language have the same grammar, but rather, UG proposes a set of rules that
would explain how children acquire their languages, or how they construct valid
sentences of their language. In short, humans have same devices in the brain to
understand and produce language.
Example
Chomsky distinguishes 2 aspects of linguistic theory: 1) Universal Grammar (UG), 2) Grammars of particular languages. UG: a set of principles common to all languages; the notion of a ‘possible human language’ and represents innate linguistic knowledge.
Example
- Only nouns and verbs are found in all human languages.
- The adjectives category, while very common, is not universal. In many languages (such as Korean), there are no true adjectives and no direct translations for English sentences.
- Ku chay-i caymi issta.
that book interest exist
‘That book is interesting’
The cat is hungry OR - The cat has hunger.
- The cat hungers
Chomsky distinguishes 2 aspects of linguistic theory: 1) Universal Grammar (UG), 2) Grammars of particular languages. UG: a set of principles common to all languages; the notion of a ‘possible human language’ and represents innate linguistic knowledge.
- Linguistics is part of theoretical cognitive psychology.
- Linguistic competence: ‘the speaker-hearer’s knowledge of his language’
- Language faculty: the place where the relatively static knowledge stored.
- Linguistic Performance: ‘the actual use of language in concrete situations’
Fruitful and banificial knowledge great job done by you please keep it up
ReplyDelete